Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms Xeon E5-2650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1764 days newer than Xeon E5-2650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 21% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2650 - 182 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2650
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i3-7100T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
