Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3500U outperforms Xeon E5-2650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3500U is 2497 days newer than Xeon E5-2650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3500U - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
- Performs up to 13% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2650 - 171 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500U |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 15 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | No |