Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 1459 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 165 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
165
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Athlon |
Haswell | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |