Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2375 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 12% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2640 - 172 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
172
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Athlon |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |