Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2640 v3 outperforms Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2640 v3 is 736 days newer than Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Performs up to 11% better in Lost Ark than Pentium G645T - 244 vs 219 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 35 vs 90 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
219
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | Intel Pentium G645T |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
90 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |