Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 2060 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 65% better in F1 23 than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 235 vs 142 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-2640 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i9-9900
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
