Key Differences
In short — Core i5-650 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-650 is 1333 days older than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-650 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-650
- Performs up to 2% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 600 vs 588 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 73 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
600
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €148.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14701 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-650 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 73 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |