Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690S outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4690S is 242 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690S - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690S
- Performs up to 9% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 127 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
127
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€70.78
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €70.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690S |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |