Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2640 v2 outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2640 v2 is 690 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |