Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is 2735 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Performs up to 3% better in Death Stranding than FX-8150 - 219 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
