Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 1212 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-2620 - 203 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |