Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3591 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 11% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-2620 - 164 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€164.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €164.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |