Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 130 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 30% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G1840 - 126 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 53 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
97
76%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 924 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell-E | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
85 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |