Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 906 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 8% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 658 vs 609 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 16 vs 6 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
658
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€290.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €290.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |