Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2381 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 153% better in Diablo IV than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 268 vs 106 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 16 vs 6 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
268
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€278.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €278.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43957 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
569
26.20912022109627%
Multi-Core
2519
27.46701559262894%
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |