Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 2929 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2388G - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 32% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 269 vs 204 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2609 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Xeon E-2388G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
