Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8840U outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8840U is 3748 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
- Performs up to 35% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 153 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 28 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2609 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 7 8840U
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2609 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
350
13.977635782747605%
Multi-Core
998
11.387494294842536%
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8840U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
