Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 2115 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 140 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 10% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 164 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€476.56
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €476.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |