Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-12900KS on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-12900KS is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 274 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-12900KS.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €520.99 vs €579.04
- Up to 9% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-13900F - €3.98 vs €4.39 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-12900KS - 132 vs 131 FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
FPS
131
99%
Value, €/FPS
€3.98/FPS
100%
Price, €
€520.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €520.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13446 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.39/FPS
90%
Price, €
€579.04
89%
FPS Winner
Buy for €579.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13446 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900KS | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 5th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
150 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |