Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1486 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 134 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
