Buy on Amazon
€18.29
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1386 days newer than Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-3220 - 200 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Intel Core i3-3220 3.30 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread 3 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processore LGA 1155
Buy for €18.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i3-3220
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
