Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G is 2458 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G
- Performs up to 16% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 140 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2021
FPS
140
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€532
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €532 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5750G |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Cezanne |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | No |