Buy on Amazon
€579.7
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $749
Availability
MSRP in USD: $749
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 1904 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 154 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€579.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - Processore (16C/32T, 72 MB di cache, 4,7 GHz di boost massimo)
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
