Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 2492 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 29% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 603 vs 466 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |