Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 2129 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 18% better in Dota 2 than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 219 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 85 vs 105 Watts
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
219
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€263.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €263.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Matisse | Codename | Haswell-E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 85 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |