Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms Xeon E5-1607 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1211 days newer than Xeon E5-1607 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 455 vs 451 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1607 v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |