Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1535M v5 outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1535M v5 is 1149 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than Core i3-3240T - 150 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 35 vs 45 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |