Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 2318 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-3240T - 119 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240T - 15 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 8 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
