Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1290 v2 outperforms Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1290 v2 is 111 days older than Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Pentium G645T - 146 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 35 vs 87 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
FPS
144
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 662 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 | vs | Intel Pentium G645T |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Pentium |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
87 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |