Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms Xeon E3-1285L v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 1794 days newer than Xeon E3-1285L v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 134 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€136.32
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €136.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18080 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |