Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 3315 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E3-1280 - 135 vs 129 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€103
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €103 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |