Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1280 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1280 is 2102 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280
- Performs up to 12% better in Diablo IV than Celeron G3930T - 115 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1280
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
