Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1280 v5 outperforms Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1280 v5 is 1744 days newer than Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5
- Performs up to 8% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-2600K - 173 vs 160 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
160
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €148.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |