Buy on Amazon
€314
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP $799
Availability
MSRP $799
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Xeon E3-1280 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2713 days newer than Xeon E3-1280 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1280 v3
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 82 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 9% better in God of War than Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 186 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 5950X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
186
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€314
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Processore Ryzen 9 5950X (16 C/32 T, 72 MB di cache, boost massimo fino a 4,9 GHz)
Buy for €314 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 624 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1280 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Ryzen 9 5950X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Vermeer |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
82 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
