Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E3-1280 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2713 days newer than Xeon E3-1280 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1280 v3
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 82 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 203 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€242.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €242.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 618 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
82 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |