Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3513 days newer than Xeon E3-1270 v3.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 34% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 267 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
267
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€201.2
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €201.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 623 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1270 v3 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |