Buy on Amazon
€520
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP $699
Availability
MSRP $699
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 3404 days newer than Xeon E3-1270 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1270 v3
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 80 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 17% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 139 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen 9 7950X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
139
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€520
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Amd Ryzen 9 7950X Processore, 16 Core/32 Thread Sfrenati, Architettura Zen 4, 80 Mb L3 Cache, Nero, 4 x 4 x 0.27 cm; 79.38 grammi
Buy for €520 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E3-1270 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Ryzen 9 7950X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1270 v3 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 170 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
