Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 2713 days newer than Xeon E3-1270 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 216 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€136.11
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €136.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 391 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |