Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1265L v3 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1265L v3 is 2226 days older than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Resident Evil 4 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 171 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon E3-1265L v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
