Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 4294 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 63% better in Far Cry 3 than Xeon E3-1260L - 199 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 24 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
199
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€398.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €398.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Core i7-13700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |