Buy on Amazon
€583
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4294 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Dead Space than Xeon E3-1260L - 164 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 32 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€583
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-13900F, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop 24 core (8 P-core + 16 E-core) Cache 36 MB, fino a 5,6 GHz
Buy for €583 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1260L
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
