Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 3017 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 4% better in HITMAN 3 than Xeon E3-1260L - 195 vs 188 FPS
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1260L
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
