Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1260L outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1260L is 192 days older than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-4100 - 118 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |