Buy on Amazon
€100.64
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $74
Availability
MSRP in USD: $74
Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G7400 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G7400 is 3929 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G7400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G7400
- Performs up to 22% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1240 - 143 vs 117 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Pentium Gold G7400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
143
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€100.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Pentium® Gold G7400, processore desktop, per sistemi desktop cache 6M, fino a 3,7 GHz
Buy for €100.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E3-1240
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Pentium Gold G7400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
