Buy on Amazon
€78
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6400 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6400 is 3315 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E3-1240 - 115 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 58 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Pentium Gold G6400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
115
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Pentium Gold G6400 processor 4 GHz 4 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for €78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Xeon E3-1240
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Pentium Gold G6400
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | 58 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
