Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 3895 days newer than Xeon E3-1220L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2
- Consumes up to 89% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 17 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 127% better in F1 23 than Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 340 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
340
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€723.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €723.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12385 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220L v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 150 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |