Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Xeon E3-1220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 3929 days newer than Xeon E3-1220.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 96% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E3-1220 - 474 vs 242 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 - 12 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
474
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€142.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €142.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4351 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |