Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2176M outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2176M is 456 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2176M
- Performs up to 9% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3930T - 349 vs 320 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2176M - 35 vs 45 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E-2176M
Server/Workstation • Apr 4th, 2018
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2176M | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 45 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
