Key Differences
In short — FX-4100 outperforms Pentium P6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4100 is 381 days newer than Pentium P6100.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6100
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield IV than Pentium P6100 - 368 vs 363 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6100 - 4 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
368
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€22.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6100 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Arrandale | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |