Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Pentium Gold G6405 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 895 days older than the cheaper Pentium Gold G6405.
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €69.0 vs €635.0
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 58 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Pentium Gold G6405 - 129 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 24 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75687 minutes ago
Buy for €635 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75688 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
848
66.56200941915228%
Multi-Core
1760
23.61148376710491%
Intel Pentium Gold G6405 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Pentium Gold | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |